Distant Conflicts, Nearby Agendas: Ukraine, Gaza, and Taiwan

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29105/rcp.v8i1.91

Keywords:

agenda-setting, framing, international political communication, Latin American press, international conflicts

Abstract

Objective. To examine how three leading Latin American newspapers rank and frame coverage of the conflicts in Ukraine, Gaza, and Taiwan, and what horizons of political intelligibility they offer their publics. Method. The study uses a qualitative comparative design combining qualitative content analysis, comparative framing analysis, and a discourse-sensitive reading of agency, legitimacy, and victimization. The corpus consists of 54 journalistic texts published by La Jornada (Mexico), El Tiempo (Colombia), and La Nación (Argentina) across three critical windows: the onset of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the Gaza escalation after October 7, 2023, and the Taiwan crisis associated with Nancy Pelosi’s visit in August 2022. Results. Coverage of the conflict in Ukraine was the most sustained and stabilized around sovereignty and aggression; Gaza coverage was intense but contested among security, humanitarian, and occupation frames; and Taiwan coverage was more episodic and technified, emphasizing strategic and technological risk. Latin America appeared as an affected observer in Ukraine and Taiwan, and as a morally interpellated space in Gaza. Conclusions. The study links second-level agenda-setting, framing, and discourse analysis without conflating media salience with audience effects, and shows that the regional press distributes visibility, agency, and moral proximity unevenly.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amado, A. (2016). Política pop: De líderes populistas a telepresidentes. Ariel.

Ardévol-Abreu, A., Gil de Zúñiga, H., & McCombs, M. (2020). Orígenes y desarrollo de la teoría de la agenda setting en comunicación: Tendencias en España (2014-2019). El Profesional de la Información, 29(4), e290414. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.jul.14 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.jul.14

Aruguete, N. (2015). El poder de la agenda: Política, medios y público. Biblos.

Aruguete, N. (2017). Agenda setting y framing: Un debate teórico inconcluso. Más Poder Local, (30), 36–42.

Bennett, W. L. (1990). Toward a theory of press-state relations in the United States. Journal of Communication, 40(2), 103–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1990.tb02265.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1990.tb02265.x

Bhowmik, S., & Fisher, J. (2023). Framing the Israel-Palestine conflict 2021: Investigation of CNN’s coverage from a peace journalism perspective. Media, Culture & Society, 45(5), 1019–1035. https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437231154766 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437231154766

Borah, P. (2011). Conceptual issues in framing theory: A systematic examination of a decade’s literature. Journal of Communication, 61(2), 246–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01539.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01539.x

Butler, J. (2009). Frames of war: When is life grievable? Verso.

Campbell, D. (1992). Writing security: United States foreign policy and the politics of identity. University of Minnesota Press.

Campo, E., Gutiérrez, M., & Moreno Cano, A. (2024). Autoría en la cobertura de la guerra en Ucrania: El trabajo de redacción prima sobre las crónicas de corresponsales. Revista de Comunicación, 23(1), 97–117. https://doi.org/10.26441/RC23.1-2024-3319 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26441/RC23.1-2024-3319

Castells, M. (2009). Communication power. Oxford University Press.

Chouliaraki, L. (2006). The spectatorship of suffering. Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446220658

Cottle, S. (2006). Mediatized conflict: Developments in media and conflict studies. Open University Press.

D’Angelo, P. (2019). Framing theory and journalism. En T. P. Vos & F. Hanusch (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of journalism studies (pp. 1–10). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118841570.iejs0021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118841570.iejs0021

de Vreese, C. H. (2005). News framing: Theory and typology. Information Design Journal + Document Design, 13(1), 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1075/idjdd.13.1.06vre DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/idjdd.13.1.06vre

Dearing, J. W., & Rogers, E. M. (1996). Agenda-setting. Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452243283

Della Porta, D. (2008). Comparative analysis: Case-oriented versus variable-oriented research. En D. Della Porta & M. Keating (Eds.), Approaches and methodologies in the social sciences: A pluralist perspective (pp. 198–222). Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801938.012

Diez-Gracia, A. (2024). Agenda y demanda informativa sobre la guerra de Ucrania en la prensa internacional. Revista de Comunicación, 23(2), 53–71. https://doi.org/10.26441/RC23.2-2024-3529 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26441/RC23.2-2024-3529

Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x

Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977. Pantheon.

Fu, W.-H. (2025). International news reporting on Nancy Pelosi’s trip to Taiwan in 2022: A frame analysis. Jurnal Komunikasi, 17(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.24912/jk.v17i1.32231 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24912/jk.v17i1.32231

Godefroidt, A., Berbers, A., & d’Haenens, L. (2016). What’s in a frame? A comparative content analysis of American, British, French, and Russian news articles. International Communication Gazette, 78(8), 777–801. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048516640482 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048516640482

Golan, G. (2006). Inter-media agenda setting and global news coverage: Assessing the influence of The New York Times on three network television evening news programs. Journalism Studies, 7(2), 323–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700500533643 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700500533643

Hansen, L. (2006). Security as practice: Discourse analysis and the Bosnian war. Routledge.

Kozman, C., & Cozma, R. (2025). Comparing headlines during conflict: War and peace journalism in the coverage of the 2023 Israel-Gaza war in the Associated Press and Qatar News Agency. Electronic News, 19(3), 131–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/19312431241304076 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/19312431241304076

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8

Mayring, P. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: Theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution. Beltz. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9181-6_13

McCombs, M. (2004). Setting the agenda: The mass media and public opinion. Polity.

McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176–187. https://doi.org/10.1086/267990 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/267990

McCombs, M., Llamas, J. P., Lopez-Escobar, E., & Rey, F. (1997). Candidate images in Spanish elections: Second-level agenda-setting effects. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 74(4), 703–717. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909707400404 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909707400404

Miskimmon, A., O’Loughlin, B., & Roselle, L. (2013). Strategic narratives: Communication power and the new world order. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315871264

Ptaszek, G., Yuskiv, B., & Khomych, S. (2024). War on frames: Text mining of conflict in Russian and Ukrainian news agency coverage on Telegram during the Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022. Media, War & Conflict, 17(1), 41–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/17506352231166327 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/17506352231166327

Rantanen, T. (2021). Toward hybridity? Nationality, ownership, and governance of news agencies in Europe. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 98(1), 263–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699020923605 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699020923605

Said, E. W. (1978). Orientalism. Pantheon.

Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529682571

Semetko, H. A., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2000). Framing European politics: A content analysis of press and television news. Journal of Communication, 50(2), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02843.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02843.x

Thussu, D. K. (2018). International communication: Continuity and change (3rd ed.). Bloomsbury.

Tickner, A., & Blaney, D. L. (Eds.). (2012). Thinking international relations differently. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203129920

Van Gorp, B. (2010). Strategies to take subjectivity out of framing analysis. En P. D’Angelo & J. A. Kuypers (Eds.), Doing news framing analysis: Empirical and theoretical perspectives (pp. 84–109). Routledge.

Wanta, W., Golan, G., & Lee, C. (2004). Agenda setting and international news: Media influence on public perceptions of foreign nations. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 81(2), 364–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900408100209 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900408100209

Published

2026-07-13

How to Cite

İşcan, T. (2026). Distant Conflicts, Nearby Agendas: Ukraine, Gaza, and Taiwan. Revista De Comunicación Política, 8(1), 59–78. https://doi.org/10.29105/rcp.v8i1.91