Media systems in Latin America: Postcolonial persistences and institutional legacies on the media-power relation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29105/rcp.v7i1.68Keywords:
Media systems, multiple modernities, media modernization, Global South, Latin AmericaAbstract
Since Hallin and Mancini’s (2004) seminal work, many scholars from around the world have proposed different models of media systems for countries and regions outside the Western world. Particular challenges have arisen when conceptualizing the systems in Latin America, where shifting liberal and polarized pluralist models have been proposed, and where media traits like clientelism and collusion remain in spite of political, economic and social changes. We contend that one obstacle to the characterization of the resilience of certain structures and practices in this region is the lack of a historical perspective to account for specific processes of media modernization. Drawing on the multiple modernization paradigm, as well as on post-colonial theories, system differentiation theories of the Global South, and theories of uneven regional development, we understand Latin American modernization processes as the appropriation, adaptation, or rejection of certain elements of Western institutions, ideals and values. In media systems, this might produce: (a) centralization of power, (b) a struggle between elites, (c) state-driven differentiation, and (d) regional or local subsystems. Our historical perspective aims to explain the prevalence of several media structures, and show how institutional legacies yield core media traits, in order to pave the way for further model inference.
Downloads
References
Aguilar Ortega, T. (2019). Desarrollo humano y desigualdad en México. México y la Cuenca del Pacífico, 8(22), 121−141. https://doi.org/10.32870/mycp.v8i22.573 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32870/mycp.v8i22.573
Ameglio, P., Espejo, G. M., & Ariza, I., (2021). Paro nacional en Colombia: espiral de la resistencia civil no violenta, medios de comunicación y mecanismos de impunidad. Revista de Cultura de Paz, 5, 105−122.
Appendini, K. A. d., Murayama, D., & Domínguez, R. M. (1972). Desarrollo desigualen México: 1900 y 1960. Estudios Demográficos y Urbanos, 6(01), 1−39. https://doi.org/10.24201/edu.v6i01.185 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24201/edu.v6i01.185
Ávalos, A. (2021). Un acercamiento a los actores principales retratados en la prensadigital salvadoreña durante los primeros 100 días de gobierno de NayibBukele. En J. A. Hidalgo & S. De León (Eds.), Transformaciones mediáticas y comunicacionales en la era posdigital (pp. 67−92). RIA Editorial.
Azevedo, F. A. (2006). Mídia e democracia no Brasil: relações entre o sistema de mídia e o sistema político. Opinião Pública, 12, 88−113. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-62762006000100004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-62762006000100004
Baldoni, M. (2012). La disputa entre periodismo independiente y periodismo militante: apuntes para analizar las tensiones en la ética periodística en la Argentina contemporánea. Quórum Académico, 9(2), 213−245.
Becerra, M., & and Mastrini, G. (2017). La concentración infocomunicacional en América Latina (2000-2015): nuevos medios y tecnologías, menos actores. Universidad Nacional de Quilmes.
Behrend, J., & Whitehead, L. (2016). Illiberal Practices: Territorial Variance within Large Federal Democracies. JHU Press.
Behrend, J., & Whitehead, L. (2021). Mixed messages about democratization in themany Mexicos. Latin American Policy, 12(2), 369−384. https://doi.org/10.1111/lamp.12231 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/lamp.12231
Bhambra, G. (2013). The Possibilities of, and for, Global Sociology: A Post-colonial Perspective. Political Power and Social Theory, 24, 295−314. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0198-8719(2013)0000024017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/S0198-8719(2013)0000024017
Campos-Freire, F. (2009). Modelos de televisión pública europea y latinoamericana. Chasqui. Revista Latinoamericana de Comunicación, (108), 4–11.
Castro, L., Humprecht, E., Engesser, S., Brüggemann, M. L., & Büchel, F. (2017). Rethinking Hallin and Mancini Beyond the West: An Analysis of Media Systems in Central and Eastern Europe. International Journal of Communication, 11, 4797–4823.
Chakravartty, P., & Roy, S. (2013). Media Pluralism Redux: Towards New Frameworks of Comparative Media Studies “Beyond the West”. Political Communication, 30(3), 349−370. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2012.737429 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2012.737429
Coatsworth, J. H. (2008). Inequality, Institutions and Economic Growth in Latin America. Journal of Latin American Studies, 40(3), 545−569. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022216X08004689 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022216X08004689
Cortés, A. (2014). A partir y más allá de Luhmann: especialización concéntrica ysub/sobre integración en América Latina. Andamios, 11(24), 289−312. https://doi.org/10.29092/uacm.v11i24.243 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29092/uacm.v11i24.243
Costa, S. (2018). The research on modernity in Latin America: Lineages anddilemmas. Current Sociology, 67(6), 838−855. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392118807523 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392118807523
De Albuquerque, A. (2005). Another ‘Fourth Branch’: Press and Political Culture in Brazil. Journalism, 6(4), 486−504. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884905056817 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884905056817
De Albuquerque, A. (2011). On models and margins. Comparative media models viewed from a Brazilian perspective. En D. Hallin & P. Mancini (Eds.), Comparing Media Systems beyond the Western World (pp. 72−95). Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139005098.006
De Albuquerque, A. (2019). Journalism and Multiple Modernities: The Folha de S. Paulo Reform in Brazil. Journalism Studies, 20(11), 1546−1562. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2018.1528881 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2018.1528881
De León, S., & García-Macías, A. (2022). Cinco tendencias subnacionales del desarrollo mediático en México. Frontera Norte, 34. https://doi.org/10.33679/rfn.v1i1.2264 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33679/rfn.v1i1.2264
Durazo-Herrmann, J. (2016). Social heterogeneity, political mediation, and subnational illiberalism: Oaxaca and Puebla, Mexico. En J. Behrend & L. Whitehead (Eds.), Illiberal Practices: Territorial Variance within Large Federal Democracies (pp. 230−261). JHU Press.
Durazo-Herrmann, J., & Pereira, F. H. (2022). Political stability and subnationalmedia systems: Comparing Bahia and the Federal District (Brazil). Communication Research and Practice, 8(3), 197−213. https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2022.2056423 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2022.2056423
Eisenstadt, S. N. (2000). Multiple Modernities. Daedalus, 129(1), 1−29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298000290031201
Eisenstadt, S. N. (2002). The Civilizations of the Americas: The Crystallization of Distinct Modernities. Comparative Sociology, 1(1), 43−61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/156913202317346746
Eisenstadt, S. N. (2013). América Latina y el problema de las múltiples modernidades. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales, 58(218),153−164. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0185-1918(13)72293-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0185-1918(13)72293-1
Esser, F., & Stromback, J. (2012a). Comparing Election Campaign Communication. En F. Esser & T. Hanitzsch (Eds.), The Handbook of Comparative Communication Research (pp. 289−307). Routledge.
Esser, F., & Stromback, J. (2012b). Comparing News on National Elections. En F.Esser & T. Hanitzsch (Eds.), The Handbook of Comparative Communication Research (pp. 307−326). Routledge.
Flew, T., & Waisbord, S. (2015). The ongoing significance of national media systems in the context of media globalization. Media, Culture & Society, 37(4), 620−636. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443714566903 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443714566903
Gallegos, E. G. (2013). La salida hermenéutica a la disputa en las teorías de las modernidades: De la posmodernidad a las modernidades entrelazadas. Andamios, 10(22), 215−236. https://doi.org/10.29092/uacm.v10i22.274 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29092/uacm.v10i22.274
George, C. (2013). Diversity around a democratic core: The universal and the particular in journalism. Journalism, 14(4), 490−503. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884912464169 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884912464169
Gervasoni, C. (2016). The dimensions of democratic and hybrid subnationalregimes: Evidence from an expert survey in Argentina. En J. Behrend & L. Whitehead (Eds.), Illiberal Practices: Territorial Variance within Large Federal Democracies (pp. 120−161). JHU Press.
González, R. (2013). Economically-Driven Partisanship—Official Advertising and Political Coverage in Mexico: The Case of Morelia. Journalism and Mass Communication, 3(1), 14−33.
González, R., & Echeverría, M. (2017). A medio camino: El sistema mediático mexicano y su irregular proceso de modernización. Revista Mexicana de Opinión Pública, (24), 35−51. https://doi.org/10.22201/fcpys.24484911e.2018.24.60437 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22201/fcpys.24484911e.2018.24.60437
Guerrero, M. A., & Márquez-Ramírez, M. (2014). The ‘Captured Liberal’ Model of Media Systems in Latin America. En M. A. Guerrero & M. Márquez-Ramírez (Eds.), Media Systems and Communication Policies in Latin America (pp. 43−65). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137409058_3
Habermas, J. (1981). Historia y crítica de la opinión pública. Gustavo Gigli.
Hallin, D. (2020). Comparative Media Studies in the Digital Age. Comparative Research, System Change, and the Complexity of Media Systems. International Journal of Communication, 14, 5775−5786.
Hallin, D. C., Mellado, C., & Mancini, P. (2021). The Concept of Hybridity in Journalism Studies. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 28(1), 219−237. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612211039704 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612211039704
Hallin, D., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790867
Hallin, D., & Mancini, P. (2007). Un estudio comparado de los medios en América Latina. En B. Díaz (Ed.), Medios de comunicación: el escenario iberoamericano (pp. 91−94). Fundación Telefónica.
Hallin, D., & Mancini, P. (2012). Comparing Media Systems Beyond the Western World. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139005098
Hallin, D., & Mancini, P. (2017). Ten years after comparing media systems: What have we learned? Political Communication, 34(2), 155−171. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2016.1233158 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2016.1233158
Hallin, D., & Papathanassopoulos, S. (2002). Political clientelism and the media: southern Europe and Latin America in comparative perspective. Media, Culture & Society, 24(2), 175−196. https://doi.org/10.1177/016344370202400202 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016344370202400202
Hughes, S. (2006). Newsrooms in Conflict: Journalism and the Democratization of Mexico. University of Pittsburgh Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt6wrd48
Hughes, S., & Lawson, C. (2005). The barriers to media opening in Latin America. Political communication, 22(1), 9−25. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600590908410 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600590908410
Humanes, M. L., Mellado, C., & Márquez-Ramírez, M. (2017). La presencia del método objetivo en los contenidos noticiosos de la prensa de Chile, México y España. Comunicación y Sociedad, (29), 165−184. https://doi.org/10.32870/cys.v0i29.5738 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32870/cys.v0i29.5738
Kaya, I. (2004). Modernity, Openness, Interpretation: A Perspective on Multiple Modernities. Social Science Information, 43(1), 35−57. https://doi.org/10.1177/05390184040685 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/05390184040685
Kleinschmidt, J. (2018). Differentiation Theory and the Global South as a Metageography of International Relations. Alternatives, 43(2), 59−80. https://doi.org/10.1177/0304375418811191 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0304375418811191
Lazcano, D., Gálvez, M. P., & Zuleta, R. (2021). Imaginarios sobre periodismo en Chile antes y después del estallido social: una mirada desde futuros profesionales. Avatares, (21), 1−22.
Lomelí, L. (2012). Potencialidades de desarrollo económico de las regiones de México. En G. Meixueiro, S. Moreno, & C. Martínez (Eds.), Desarrollo regional y competitividad en México (pp. 131−139). Centro de Estudios Sociales y de Opinión Pública.
López, M. (2018). States, elites, and inequality in Latin America. Sociology Compass, 12(8), e12598. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12598 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12598
Luna, J. P., & Soifer, H. D. (2017). Capturing Sub-National Variation in State Capacity: A Survey-Based Approach, 61(8), 887−907. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764217720964 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764217720964
Mahoney, J. (2001). Path-dependent explanations of regime change: Central America in comparative perspective. Studies in Comparative International Development, 36(1), 111−141. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02687587 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02687587
Mahoney, J. (2010). Colonialism and Postcolonial Development: Spanish America in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge University Press.doi:10.1017/CBO9780511750328 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750328
Mancini, P. (2020). Comparing Media Systems and the Digital Age. International Journal of Communication, 14, 5761−5774.
Mancini, P., & Swanson, D. (1996). Politics, Media, and Modern Democracy: Introduction. In P. Mancini & D. Swanson (Eds.), Politics, Media, and Modern Democracy (pp. 1−24). Praeger. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9798400698873.ch-001
Mascareño, A. (2003). Teoría de sistemas de América Latina. Conceptos fundamentales para la descripción de un orden social concéntrico. Persona y Sociedad, 2(17), 9−26.
McQuail, D. (1998). La acción de los medios. Amorrortu.
Pimentel, P. S., & Marques, F. P. J. (2021). De-westernizing media parallelism: How editorial interests unfold during impeachment crises. Journalism Studies, 22(3), 282−304. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2020.1867000 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2020.1867000
Pinto, P. A. (2017). Mídia brasileira e a perspectiva regional: uma nova proposta de estudo exposta na análise dos mercados das regiões Norte e Sul. Compolítica, 7(2), 225−244. https://doi.org/10.21878/compolitica.2017.7.2.127 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21878/compolitica.2017.7.2.127
Portes, A. (1973). Modernity and development: A critique. Studies in Comparative International Development, 8(3), 247−279. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02800432 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02800432
Reyna, V. H. (2024). “A Mercenary, a Thug … not Even a Journalist”: The Stigmatization of News Workers in Mexico. Journalism Practice. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2023.2300275 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2023.2300275
Reyna, V. H., Echeverría, M. & González, R. A. (2020). Beyond exogenous models: Mexican journalism’s modernization in its own terms. Journalism Studies 21(13), 1815−1835. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2020.1796765 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2020.1796765
Sachsenmaier, D., & Riedel, J. (2002). Reflections on Multiple Modernities: European, Chinese and Other Interpretations. Brill. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047401735
Salazar, G. (2019). Strategic Allies and the Survival of Critical Media under Repressive Conditions: An Empirical Analysis of Local Mexican Press. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 24(3), 341−362. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161219843200 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161219843200
Schmidt, V. H. (2010). Modernity and diversity: reflections on the controversy between modernization theory and multiple modernists. Social Science Information, 49(4), 511−538. https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018410376882 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018410376882
Segura, M. S., & Waisbord, S. (2016). Media movements: Civil society and media policy reform in Latin America. Zed Books. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350221321
Simpser, A., Slater, D., & Wittenberg, J. (2018). Dead but not gone: Contemporary legacies of communism, imperialism, and authoritarianism. Annual Review of Political Science, 21, 419−439. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-062615-020900. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-062615-020900
Souza, C. (2016). The rise and fall of illiberal politics in the Brazilian State of Bahia. En J. Behrend & L. Whitehead (Eds.), Illiberal Practices: Territorial Variancewithin Large Federal Democracies (pp. 197−229). JHU Press.
Spohn, W. (2010). Political Sociology: Between Civilizations and Modernities: A Multiple Modernities Perspective. European Journal of Social Theory, 13(1), 49−66. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431009355864 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431009355864
The Economist (2021). Democracy Index 2020. In sickness and in health? https://www.eiu.com/n/campaigns/democracy-index-2020
Thibault, S., Bastien, F., Gosselin, T., Brin, C., & Scott, C. (2020). Is There a Distinct Quebec Media Subsystem in Canada? Evidence of Ideological and Political Orientations among Canadian News Media Organizations. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 53(3), 638−657. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423920000189 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423920000189
Thompson, J. B. (1995). The Media and Modernity: A Social Theory of the Media. Stanford University Press.
Thorp, R. (2012). A Historical Perspective on the Political Economy of Inequality in Latin America. En J. Santiso & J. Dayton-Johnson (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Latin American Political Economy (pp. 149−167). Oxford University. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199747504.013.0006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199747504.013.0006
Vaca, M. (2018). Four Theories of the Press: 60 Years and Counting. Routledge.
Vaccari, C. (2013). Digital Politics in Western Democracies. A Comparative Study. JHU Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/book.27233
Voltmer, K. (2011). How Far Can Media Systems Travel? Applying Hallin and Mancini’s Comparative Framework Outside the Western World. En D. Hallin &P. Mancini (Eds.), Comparing Media Systems Beyond the Western World (pp. 224−245). Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139005098.013
Voltmer, K. (2013). The Media in Transitional Democracies. Wiley.
Voltmer, K., & Wasserman, H. (2014). Journalistic Norms Between Universality andDomestication: Journalists’ Interpretations of Press Freedom in Six New Democracies. Global Media and Communication, 10(2), 177−192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742766514540073 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1742766514540073
Waisbord, S. (2000). Watchdog Journalism in South America. Columbia University Press.
Waisbord, S. (2005). In journalism we trust? Credibility and fragmented journalismin Latin America. En K. Voltmer (Ed.), Mass media and political communicationin new democracies (pp. 64−77). Routledge.
Waisbord, S. (2012) Political communication in Latin America. En H. Semetko & M. Scammell (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Political Communication (pp. 437−449). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446201015.n35 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446201015.n35
Whitehead, L. (2006). Latin America: A New Interpretation. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403977229
Williamson, J. G. (1965). Regional Inequality and the Process of National Development: A Description of the Patterns. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 13(4),1−84. https://doi.org/10.1086/450136 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/450136
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Martín Echeverría, Rubén A. González Macías, Víctor Hugo Reyna
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Los derechos del trabajo pertenecen al autor o autores. Sin embargo, al enviarlo para su publicación en la Revista de Comunicación Política de la Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Relaciones Internacionales de la Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, el autor o autores otorgan el derecho a dicha institución para su publicación en medio electrónico.
La licencia que se utiliza es la de atribución de Creative Commons, que permite a terceros utilizar lo publicado siempre que se mencione la autoría del trabajo y a la primera publicación que es en la Revista de Comunicación Política.
Asimismo, el o los autores tendrán en cuenta que no estará permitido enviar la publicación a ninguna otra revista, sin importar el formato. Los autores estarán en posibilidad de realizar otros acuerdos contractuales independientes y adicionales para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión del artículo (p. ej., repositorio institucional o publicación en un libro) siempre que indiquen claramente que el trabajo se publicó por primera vez en la Revista de Comunicación Política de la Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Relaciones Internacionales de la Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León.
