Inter-Candidate Agenda Setting Effect of the 2018 Mexican Presidential Election: Political Party Candidates Vs. an Inde-pendent Candidate
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29105/rcp.v6i1.56Keywords:
candidates, election campaign, inter-candidate agenda setting effect, effectMexico, presidential electionAbstract
The 2018 Mexican presidential election marked the initiation of a new political communication dynamic in which traditional electoral communication strategies of political parties were challenged by an independent candidate. This study evaluated this innovative electoral setting by examining Telemundo’s electoral coverage of party-affiliated candidates —Anaya Cortés, Meade Kuribreña, and López Obrador— and the independent candidate —Rodríguez Calderón— through agenda setting theory. The data was collected from Telemundo’s national newscast “Noticias Telemundo” with José Díaz Balart during INE’s official 90-day electoral campaign period. The inter-candidate agenda setting effect regarding the horse race topics was strong among the contenders suggesting that Telemundo’s journalists were disseminating the same information regarding party candidates, but the journalists’ reporting differed when covering the independent candidate. Outcomes indicate that there were two dominant political discussions in Telemundo regarding horse race topics, one emerging from all party candidates and the other one from the independent candidate. The inter-candidate agenda setting effect of issues presented strong correlations among all contenders, suggesting that their policy issues news agendas in Telemundo were nearly identical, which could have made it difficult for voters to distinguish among the candidates’ campaign messages. Overall, Rodríguez Calderón challenged parties’ political communication strategies in terms of horse race topics for his ability to disseminate a distinct campaign message in Telemundo despite having acquired the most negative coverage from journalists. But the independent candidate did not represent an opposition for parties regarding issues because his political rhetoric was not dissimilar from the other contenders.
Downloads
References
Acosta Valverde, M., & Parra Rosales, M. de L. (1994). Los procesos electorales en medios de comunicación. Academica Mexicana de Derechos Humanos, Universidad Iberoamericana.
Alder, L. (1993). The Mexican Case: The media in the 1998 Presidential election. In T.E. Skidmore (Ed.), Television, Politics and the Transition to Democracy in Latin America (pp. 145−173). Johns Hopkins University Press.
Arredondo Ramírez, P., Fregoso Peralta, G., & Trejo Delabre, R. (1991). Así calló el sistema: Communicación y elecciones en 1998. Universidad de Guadalajara.
Arroyo, M. (2012, March 15). Candidaturas independietes. El Economista. http://eleconomista.com.mx/columnas/columna-especial-politica/2012/02/15/candidaturas-independientes
Beltrán, U. (2020). Traditional Media and Social Networks in the 2018 Presidential Election. Política y Gobierno, 38(2), 1−19.
Bennett, W. L. (2005). News: The Politics of Illusion (6th edition). Pearson/Longman.
Bennett, W. L., & Manheim, J. B. (2001). The Big Spin: Strategic Communication and the Trans-formation of Pluralistic Democracy. In W.L. Bennett & R. M. Entman (Eds.), Mediated Pol-itics: Communication in the Future of Democracy (pp. 279−298). Cambridge University. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613852.014
Berelson, B. R., Lazarsfeld, P. F., & McPhee, W. N. (1954). Voting: A study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign. University of Chicago Press.
Bernal Sahagún, V. M., & Torreblanca Jacques, E. (1998). Espacios del Silencio. Nuestro Tiempo.
Cámara de Diputados. (1990). Código Federal de Instituciones y Procedimientos Electorales. https://www.diputados.gob.mx/LeyesBiblio/abro/cofipe/COFIPE_abro_14ene08.pdf.
Cámara de Diputados. (2013, December 27). Decreto por el que se reforma el inciso 3) y se adi-ciona un inciso o) de la fracción IV del artículo 116. https://www.diputados.gobmx/leyesBiblio/proceso/docleg/62/214_DOF_27dic13.pdf
Cámara de Diputados. (2024). Constitución Política de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos. https://www.diputados.gob.mx/LeyesBiblio/pdf/CPEUM.pdf
Campell, D. T., & Kenny, D. A. (1999). A Primer on Regression Artifacts. Guilford Press.
Castañeda, J. G. (2016, February 1). Por una candidatura independiente única. Revista Nexos. https://www.nexos.com.mx/?p=27509
Cohen, B. (1963). The Press and Foreign Policy. Princeton University Press.
Corona Nakamura, L. A., & Hernández Velazco, G. (2015). Las candidaturas independientes en México. Revista de Investigacões Constitucionais, 2(2), 117−135. https://doi.org/10.5380/rinc.v2i2.44513 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5380/rinc.v2i2.44513
Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos. (2008, August 6). Castañeda Gutman vs Estados Unidos Mexicanos. Sentencia de 6 de agosto de 2008. Serie C No 184. Corte Interamerica-na de Derechos Humanos. http://corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_184_esp.pdf
De León, E., Vermeer, S., & Trilling, D. (2023) Electoral News Sharing: A Study of Changes in News Coverage and Facebook Sharing Behavior During the 2018 Mexican Election. Infor-mation, Communication & Society, 26(6), 1193−1209. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1994629 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1994629
Díaz Jiménez, O. F. (2017). Election Campaigns, The Media and their Impact on Civic Engage-ment of Mexicans in the 2012 Presidential Election. Comunicación y Sociedad, 26(2), 123−146. http://dx.doi.org/10.32870/cys.v0i29.6302 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32870/cys.v0i29.6302
Espinoza Valle, V. A. (2019). Candidaturas independientes en México 2015: La representación partidista cuestionada. Revista Mexicana de Estudios Electorales, 3(21), 39−63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54505/somee.rmee.2019.3.21.a3
Flores, M. de los Á., & McCombs, M. E. (2010). Who Set the Television Agenda in the 2006 Mexi-can Election? News vs Advertising. Journal of Spanish Language Media, 3(1), 59−77.
Flores-Macías, G. (2013). Mexico’s 2012 Elections: The Return of the PRI. Journal of Democracy, 24(1), 128−141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2013.0006
Glowacki, M., Narayanan, V., Maynard, S., Hirsh, G., Kollanyi, B., Neudert, L. M., Howard, P., & Graphika, T. L. (2018). News and Political Information Consumption in Mexico: Mapping the 2018 Mexican Presidential Election on Twitter and Facebook. University of Oxford, In-ternet Institute. https://demtech.oii.ox.ac.uk/research/posts/news-and-political-information-consumption-in-mexico-mapping-the-2018-mexican-presidential-election-on-twitter-and-facebook/
González, R. A. (2021). The Mexican 2018 Presidential Election in the Media Landscape: News-paper Coverage, TV Spots and Twitter Interaction. In G. D. Rawnsley, Y. Ma, & K. Pothong (Eds.), Research Handbook on Political Propaganda (pp. 315−332). Edward Elgar Pub-lishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789906424.00029
Hallin, D. C., & Papathanassopoulos, S. (2002). Political Clientelism and the Media: Sourthern Europe and Latin American Comparative Perspective. Media, Culture, & Society, 24(2), 175−195. https://doi.org/10.1177/016344370202400202 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016344370202400202
Hughes, S., & Lawson, C. (2004). Propaganda and Crony Capitalism: Partisan Bias in Mexican Television News. Latin American Reserch Review, 39(3), 81−105. https://doi.org/10.1353/lar.2004.0050 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/lar.2004.0050
Instituto Nacional Electoral (INE). (2006). Resultados del Voto de los Mexicanos Residentes en el Extranjero-Proceso Electoral Federal 2005-2006. INE-Digital. http://www.votoextranjero.mx/web/vmre/historico-de-resultados
Instituto Nacional Electoral (INE). (2012). Resultados del Voto de los Mexicanos Residentes en el Extranjero-Proceso Electoral Federal 2011-2012. INE-Digital. http://www.votoextranjero.mx/web/vmre/historico-de-resultados
Instituto Nacional Electoral (INE). (2018a). Elecciones Federales 2018-Programa de Resultados Electorales Preliminares. INE-Digital. https://prep2018.ine.mx/#/presidencia/nacional/1/1/1/1
Instituto Nacional Electoral (INE). (2018b). Resultados del voto de los Mexicanos residentes en el extranjero-Proceso electoral federal 2017-2018. INE-Digital. http://www.votoextranjero.mx/web/vmre/elecciones2018
Iturbe Carbajal, C. I. (2013). Las campañas negativas a través de los anuncios en televisión: Su papel en las elecciones presidenciales de México 2006. (Doctoral thesis, Universidad Computense de Madrid). Docta Complutense. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/37861
Kavanaugh, A. L., Sheetz, S. D., Sandoval-Almazan, R., Tedesco, J. C., & Fox, E. A. (2016). Media Use During Conflicts: Information Seeking and Political Efficacy during the 2012 Mexican Elections. Government Information Quarterly, 33(1), 595−602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.01.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.01.004
Lawson, C. (2002). Building the Fourth Estate: Democratization and the Rise of a Free Press in Mexico. University of California Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520936201
Lawson, C., & McCann, J. A. (2004). Television News Mexico’s 2000 Elections and Media Effects in Emerging Democracies. British Journal of Political Science, 23(1), 1−30. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123405000013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123405000013
Lippmann, W. (1922). Public Opinion. Free Press.
López-Escobar, E., Llamas, J. P., McCombs, M. E., & Lennon, F. R. (1998). Two Levels of Agenda Setting Among Advertising and News in the 1995 Spanish Elections. Political Communica-tion, 15(2), 225−238. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609809342367 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609809342367
McCombs, M. E. (2004). Setting the Agenda: The Mass Media and Public Opinion. Polity Press.
McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. R. (1972). The Agenda-Setting Function of the Mass Media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 176−187. https://doi.org/10.1086/267990 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/267990
Mercado, A., Hellweg, S., Dozier, D., & Hofstetter, C. (2003, May 27). A Study of Agenda-Setting Theory in Presidential Debates in Mexico’s 2000 Presidential Campaign [Paper Presenta-tion]. International Communication Association, San Diego, CA. https://0-doi-org.lib.utep.du/ica_proceeding-12158.PDF
Perloff, R. (1998). Political Communication: Politics, Press, and Public in America. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Pew Research Center. (2021a, July 27). Audience for Univision Network. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/chart/sotnm-hispanic-black-audience-for-univision-network/
Pew Research Center. (2021b, July 27). Audience for Telemundo Network. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/chart/sotnm-hispanic-black-audience-for-telemundo-network/
Piñón, J. (2019). United States: Network Infrastructure of the Internet Television Industry. In M. I. Vassalo de López & G. O. Orozco Gómez (Eds.), Television Distribution Models by the Internet: Actors, Technologies, Strategies (pp. 307−340). Globo-Editorial Sulina.
Poindexter, P. M., & McCombs, M. E. (2000). Research in Mass Communication: A Practical Guide. Bedford/St. Martin’s.
Popkin, S. L. (1994). The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns (2nd ed.). The University of Chicago Press.
Rozelle, R. M., & Campbell, D. T. (1969). More Plausible Rival Hypotheses in the Cross-Lagged Panel Correlation Technique. Psychological Bulletin, 71(1), 74−80. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0026863 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0026863
Sandoval-Almazan, R. (2015). Using Twitter in Political Campaigns: The Case of the PRI Candi-date in Mexico. International Journal of E-Politics, 6(1), 1−15. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-7669-3.ch035 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEP.2015010101
Sussman, G., & Galizio, L. (2003). The Global Reproduction of American Politics. Political Com-munication, 20(1), 309−328. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600390218931 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600390218931
Vidal Correa, F. (2020). Presidential Elections in Mexico: Media Coverage of the Josefina Vázquez Mota Campaign. Women’s Studies, 49(5), 533−550. https://doi.org/10.1080/00497878.2020.1772791 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00497878.2020.1772791
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 María de los Ángeles Flores
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Los derechos del trabajo pertenecen al autor o autores. Sin embargo, al enviarlo para su publicación en la Revista de Comunicación Política de la Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Relaciones Internacionales de la Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, el autor o autores otorgan el derecho a dicha institución para su publicación en medio electrónico.
La licencia que se utiliza es la de atribución de Creative Commons, que permite a terceros utilizar lo publicado siempre que se mencione la autoría del trabajo y a la primera publicación que es en la Revista de Comunicación Política.
Asimismo, el o los autores tendrán en cuenta que no estará permitido enviar la publicación a ninguna otra revista, sin importar el formato. Los autores estarán en posibilidad de realizar otros acuerdos contractuales independientes y adicionales para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión del artículo (p. ej., repositorio institucional o publicación en un libro) siempre que indiquen claramente que el trabajo se publicó por primera vez en la Revista de Comunicación Política de la Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Relaciones Internacionales de la Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León.
